Monday, January 4, 2010
Thursday, December 17, 2009
I try the Go Wear Fit body monitoring system

I'm a skeptic. I'm used to getting 90% of what I pay for, and a story about the other 10%.
The GoWear Fit is the exception. It is device you wear like a watch that monitors what you're are doing all the time. Everything I read about the product before buying was true. it provides consistent and reliable results, insights into eating and sleeping patterns, and exercise and activity monitoring. The hardware has been light and easy to wear, and simple to interface via USB on my iMac. You do have to move it around on your arm on different days, as it will irritate if only worn in one spot. The makers of this product have worked hard to make it easy to use, and "easy" can't be overestimated with a product that needs to be used every day.
But the best, absolutely best. feature is the web hosted software. It take a tremendous effort to make software work this well and still be simple. I can't think of anything I've seen recently that is nearly as good. You upload your data and see immediately a summery of calories, calories v. your target, exercise, steps taken, sleep, weight, and calorie intake {when you input it}. You also can track weight graphically, day-by-day, or over a longer time. Inputting foods you ate that day is so intuitive and the database so large that a day's entries takes a minute or so. For getting information back out you can drill down through the elegant displays to see patterns in a category, or output detailed reports to a pdf.
This is the first of many products that will helpful in gathering information about our bodies and brains. Smartly parsing that data into useful datasets that can illustrate patterns, will ultimately lead to modifying behaviors. And that's just the beginning. There is a huge untapped power in having that data on the web where it can also be correlated with others' data.
My only low grade for this package is that it could be marketed better, what with the 2 names, changing web address, and not much info in the mainstream media given the general public's interest in weight loss and diet.
Oh and great job on the web software, but now you NEED an iPhone App.
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Fashion Photography
Photography and video by Peter Salo.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Yes, Joe.
Yes, I was at Woodstock. It was a pretty fantastic time. Hung mostly with Dave Duryea - lost Frank Colin and Don Lowry somewhere. Peter Mac rode his motorcycle right to the middle of the hillside so you can spot him in some of the pictures. Someone from Suffern, I can’t remember who, was hanging off the big speaker scaffolds and had to be removed. Saturday night I remember as a high point that lasted all night. Sly Stone, Janis Joplin, capped with the Who singing "See Me, Feel Me" as the sun came up. I had never seen that many people, let alone kids, in one place. After it was over, everyone dispersed. All 500,000.
Me too. I wasn't going back to that lame-ass summer job, and for months there was a great feeling in the air… of “if you can help someone out, do it.” There was a feeling that you could build a social system on these principles. As I hitched around Massachusetts, you didn’t need to ask if someone was at Woodstock; it didn’t matter. We were all part of the generation, and shared something. Some of my best days. Later, after a few months, I returned home from school to find most of the dads had grown their hair longer, everyone was wearing hip aviator glasses, and the Mall had store displays featuring headbands and ponchos. It was the beginning of the end.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Panasonic branding ID video on LA Live BIG Screens
Looks pretty.
These are LED screens that are lower res but big, and can be bright even in daylight.
At D2 Creative, we had 2 days to plan, design and create these in After Effects. Client was LRG Marketing Communications.
Friday, July 4, 2008
Photoshop Job at Fox News
As many of you know, Adobe Photoshop is software the visual effects industry uses for just about every image editing task under the sun. I've been following the news story wherein Fox News used the program to alter and distort the photographs of two New York Times reporters who wrote an article the network didn't like, specifically that Fox's ratings have been in a long slide. Editors at Fox News modified photos of the two journalists by making their teeth yellow, receding the hairline, putting dark cirles under the eyes, and generally attempting to make them appear ugly and untrustworthy to their viewers. We distort. You decide.Judging from the photos, Fox News could use the help in the Photoshop department. The "impeccable news judgement" seems to be open to interpretation.
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Ironman: You down with DLP?
I've made the pilgrimage to see movies projected digitally before, but hadn't seen digital projection making many inroads at the local multiplex. In fact, when a new movie theater opened in Monroe, NY last week, I asked if they would be digital... and was treated to a long list of the usual arguments: Studios will benefit, but won't pay. Theater operators have to shell out big time for new technology while a used projector is so cheap right now. New technology is unstable: you're investment could be obsoleted by better or cheaper technology in a couple of years.
So I took the kids to see Ironman this weekend at a fairly new multiplex in Toms River NJ. The picture was beautiful, bright, and about 35 feet across horizontally. Now TR is not really what you call a media center, but Marquee Cinemas made a decision about a year ago to install Christie 2K DLP projectors in it's theaters, and those theaters are in places like Glasgow KY, and Beckley, WV. These new projectors can provide the same resolution, the same brightness, and a much cleaner and more stable picture as opposed to 35mm film. Instead of a expensive and fragile 35mm print, ferried to theatres around the country, titles are distributed on a hard drive and can be played repeatedly without a scratch. There is also a satellite receiver on the roof of the theater that can grab a just released title off the bird and program it on multiple screens in a couple of hours.
For me, this movie going experience was clearly better in digital than the multiplex down the road. My kids sensed the same thing, "a bigger brighter screen" they said. This won't be lost on the ticket buying public, but for content producers it could be an opportunity.
Once digital projection becomes ubiquitous, as seems to be happening, the theaters, less constrained by the physical distribution models, will be more in control of the material they provide. They could shop around for content outside the studio's distribution networks.
So now someone with an independent film or 90 minute documentary might be able to get programmed in for a midnight show or a run within a specific geographical target by dealing with the chain. My guess is the theaters, if they thought it would draw an audience, would jump at not giving up the customary high percentage of the ticket price to the studio. Anyone with a (marketable) film on a hard drive could lobby the local theater for a spot on the schedule. This will also impact the traditional film marketplaces as well. Marquee's theaters are fed by AccessIT, a digital distribution company. I'm sure they are aware of the possibilities of supplying content they've acquired vs. distributing digital prints for the studios for a fee.
The DLP projector, installed across the country, will be a disruptive technology beyond 3D or anything else the studios are doing. I know I"m not the first to expound on these ideas, but sitting in the dark, in the pinelands of New Jersey, not in a Sony Theater on 42nd street, it seems there are big changes coming in the how we watch, and maybe what we watch.
